Hugh Pickens writes"Although global demand for solar power is still growing — about 8% more solar panels will be installed this year compared with 2010 — bankruptcies, plummeting stock prices and crushing debt loads are calling into question the viability of the solar energy industry that since the 1970s has been counted on to advance the world into a new energy age. Only a handful of manufacturers are now profitable in the face of too much capacity, which has contributed to a plunge in prices as government subsidies have been curbed. Prices for solar panels started 2011 near $1.60 per watt, but a buildup of inventory forced manufacturers into a fire sale toward the end of the second quarter that has pushed prices to near $1 per watt now. 'The prices that we're seeing today are likely not covering manufacturing costs in many cases,' says Ralph Romero. With at least seven solar-panel manufacturers filing for bankruptcy or insolvency in the last several months and six of the 10 largest publicly traded companies making solar components reporting losses in the third quarter, public-market investors are punishing the solar sector, sending shares down nearly 57% this year. Although winners are expected to emerge eventually, the question is how much more carnage there will be before that happens. 'The fact of the matter is, nobody really knows which solar companies will be pushed out of business or be forced to merge,' writes industry analyst Rodolfo Avalos. 'Nobody also knows how long it will take for the solar industry to improve even when the forecasted solar global demand for the next 5-10 years is quite promising.'"

People have been complaining for years that we need to get solar prices at or below $1/watt, and now it has happened. Ignore the fact that the production companies aren't even covering manufacturing costs at these prices, and BUY BUY BUY!

Getting these companies some orders will hopefully help to drive production costs down, and now is the perfect time to get yourself set up with an inexpensive solar array for your home, small business, RV, or camp.

This method is not meant to substitute a proper solar site selection process, but rather to augment or be used in the site selection process itself. Obviously the resolutions available will not allow you to determine to the foot where a solar installation should be placed. This is a general method to determine approximate daylight hours on a chosen area.

All you need to do is have Google Earth installed, and find the location you wish to examine. This works better the more zoomed in you are. The basis is pretty simple. Google has built in a "Show sunlight across the landscape" feature that can be accessed from the menu along the top.

The way I use this is to spot valleys and ridges that could limit the amount of time throughout the day that the installation will see direct sunlight. If your mouse has a "middle button" you can click and hold it, and then change the tilt angle of the "viewing camera" to help spot these valleys and ridges, as well as to examine further.

The slider along the top allows you to change the time of day, and if you click the "wrench" icon next to the slider bar, you can change the date as well to view sunlight across the landscape for any time of year that you wish.

Here are some example images of the same area, showing lighter and darker areas at different times of day on September 26.

6:05pm    

5:35pm    

4:00pm    

If you are looking at potential building sites on a larger plot of land, you may wish to choose a particular site that has more sunlight available. This image shows how different homes have more light available at 6:05pm

Here is 7:34am for the same area    

8:16am    

And finally with everything except deep woods illuminated by 9:09am    

Zooming out a little, you can see the same area at 7:22am, with some areas having much more light available due to ridges and tall trees.    

I really wouldn't mind if Google took this information and went further with it. Would not refuse monetary reward for creative uses, but would settle for credit

In 2008, the average annual electricity consumption for a U.S. residential utility customer was 11,040 kWh, an average of 920 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per month.

On average, electricity sources (coal, etc) emit 1.297 lbs CO2 per kWh. That means that each home (on average) was the contributing factor to the production of 14,318 lbs of CO2 in 2008.

Of the approximately 8 billion tons of carbon emitted each year, scientists believe about 30 percent is absorbed by the oceans, and about 30 percent is absorbed by terrestrial ecosystems, especially trees. The remaining 40 percent however, accumulates in the atmosphere.

Researchers say at least one large ocean, the Southern Ocean around Antarctica, is so loaded with CO2 that it's losing its ability to soak it up. The Southern Ocean alone accounts for 15 percent of the global carbon sink. Other oceans appear to be following suit.

Each year, an acre of Douglas fir trees can absorb 11,308.7 lbs of carbon dioxide.  That means that in order to offset the amount of CO2 produced to power the average home, each home would need more than 1acre of trees.

All statistics were cited from the Department of Energy, so global warming naysayers can go away unless they're a multi-front conspiracy theorist, in which case congrats I suppose...

Implementations of monitoring systems vary widely from different manufacturers both in hardware and software. Many systems incorporate a built-in LCD panel on the charge controller that will display various types of information. Also included with some charge controllers are serial (RS232) communication links which can be connected to a computer or in some cases other charge controllers for monitoring. Stepping up from the serial connection is an Ethernet connection which will generally interface with existing home/commercial networks except in the case of some manufacturers who use proprietary networking systems. Ethernet connections can be a useful tool for field technicians, as lately many laptops are not being manufactured with a serial port due to lack of demand and a desire to save space. Very few manufacturers offer wireless connections to the charge controllers through either “WIFI” connections or cell-phone/GSM/bluetooth connections, however these types of systems are becoming more common.

On the software side of monitoring systems, again there is a large variation between manufacturers. Using the data communication methods mentioned previously, information is transferred from the charge controller to either: a display panel on the controller itself, a remote display panel, or a computer. Several companies offer standalone software with their charge controllers either with purchase of the charge controller, free altogether, or as an option for a higher price. Other manufacturers have the option of a setup that sends information from the controller to a computer, and then from the computer this information is uploaded to a website on the internet, where the data can be viewed in various graphs and charts. Apollo Solar and other manufacturers have taken this a step further by offering a cellular modem that will connect to their data communication gateway and communicate the data to a webserver anywhere in the world that there is a cellular connection. This would be especially useful in remote off-grid situations where a cell phone signal is still obtainable.

Many companies have decided to offer only minimal monitoring capabilities on the charge controllers themselves, and instead sell additional accessories that can be added to the system to facilitate monitoring. Rogue Engineering is one of these manufacturers that offers two options of monitoring accessories that also double as data loggers and can store data for historical analysis. The higher end system they offer is PLC based with an open source operating system that can be modified to suit the user’s needs if desired, however this is rather advanced and would more than likely be applicable only to commercial users except in the case of residential users with a high likelyhood of customizing and ‘tinkering’ with systems.

Table 1: Charge Controller Feature Comparison

The two manufacturers that I encountered who offered the most flexibility in their monitoring systems were Apollo Solar, and Fronius. Many of the manufacturers have severely limited monitoring/data communication options as demonstrated in Table 1. I feel as though these companies are losing out on a large potential customer base with such limited options. Our world is becoming increasingly information driven, and to add to that the information needs to be available quickly and conveniently. With a lack of network connectivity a charge controller is much less attractive to someone that wishes to monitor the system closely while still being able to actually leave the location.

References:

http://apollosolar.com/

http://www.fronius.com/cps/rde/xchg/SID-03B69EC8-F88A47D4/fronius_usa/hs.xsl/2714_1447.htm

https://www.rogue-engr.com/cportal/

http://www.affordable-solar.com/tristar.ts.45.charge.controller.45amp.htm

http://www.outbackpower.com/products/charge_controllers/

http://www.blueskyenergyinc.com/

http://www.sunware.de/

]]> http://www.solardiy.info/?feed=rss2&p=159 3 http://www.solardiy.info/?p=158 http://www.solardiy.info/?p=158#comments Mon, 08 Jun 2009 02:51:52 +0000 admin http://www.solardiy.info/?p=158 I saw this post on Instructables called Solar Thermal Water Heater For Less Than Five Dollars

Obviously it is going to cost more than $5 to be able to actually use this for something, but I had never thought of using the coil from the back of a refrigerator as the tubing inside a flat plate collector before. Don't get me wrong, I find junk laying around all over the place and love to think up ways to use it, this is just one piece of junk I hadn't considered for a flat plate solar hot water collector.

They claim pretty decent heating with their not so great setup, so with some small improvements it would probably work quite decently. To do any decent scale I would probably connect a few of the coils in a parallel arrangement with headers of a larger diameter than the coils themselves.

Well reading about all that got the wheels in my head rolling and I ended up at this post on PhysicsForum about using a car radiator as a heat exchanger in a solar water heater setup. This particular setup was for preheating biodiesel to cut down on electricity costs during production, but had some excellent points. Unfortunately they never followed up with any results.

So then I stumbled over to this site about a Solar Water Heater made from a car radiator. This is also in a flat plate setup.  But of course they want you to spend money on some book rather than sharing information about it.

Well being put off by being asked to pay for access to information, I dug around some more and found this crazy long usenet forum post with lots of good info about solar water heaters, mostly related to using a car radiator as a solar collector.

From there I ended up at the Iowa Renewable Energy Association's website where I found this little blurb about using a car radiator and a fan in a solar heating system:

"Storage of solar energy in water has been a proven method over many years. This water can be used as DHW, but also can be used to heat some or all of your house, garage, or workshop. To install enough solar panels and storage to heat an entire older home would be expensive, so most people try to do just some space heat. If your house is modern and very energy efficient, then solar could do a large part of your heating. An easy method is to install "kickspace heaters," which can be as simple as a car radiator and a fan to distribute the heat from the water storage to one or two rooms."

This info comes from their page on Solar Thermal but definitely check out the rest of the site as they have loads of good information.

Using recycled parts is great, especially in something like a solar water heater, and so stuff like this really makes me think. If anyone can think of any other relatively common objects/materials that can be repurposed for a solar heater (yeah we've all heard about the soda can heaters, and recycled pipe and fittings are awesome but hopefully most folks would think of that), leave a comment here on this post.

That's all for now, just wanted to ramble about my thought process and the various places and things the internet can lead you to see and read about in a short period of time.

These links have been added to the Electricity page of SolarDIY as well.

"How to Install an RV Solar Panel"  - Might be a little too step-by-step for some, but has some good points that will make you think about your install beforehand. One thing that I do not like is that they assume the panels will be fix mounted, and a few people have expressed interest in the ability to move around one or two panels to get optimum sun on the panels when in an area with tree cover, without having to move the RV.

RV Boondocking has a set of articles detailing the installation of their 780 watt roof mount setup as well as information on an RV solar tax credit, and their battery bank system.

RV Solar - article on RV Solar Electric Power. I like the way this one was written, and it has some excellent points.

Holy Solar has two articles about the Unisolar 64w thinfilm panel they installed. one and two

12voltsolarpanels.net has a good article about RV Solar Chargers as well

Thanks for stopping by, and if you have any questions about RV/camper solar setups or the links, feel free to leave a comment on this post. I will add more as time progresses, and will also try to free up more time to add content to the site.

Here is a link to a little information about Lake Flower Apartments, although there doesn't seem to be much out there on the internet about the place.

What is very cool about the building, is that they installed a 48 collector solar domestic hot water system in March of 1987. Why they did this is anyone's guess, but it was certainly a great idea.

The history of the system is a little fuzzy but essentially it was used to an unknown capacity from 1987 (when installed) until sometime in the late 90's/early 2000's. In 2006 the system was drained and refilled, and some maintenance was performed by another contracting company. This included replacing some insulation as well as rerouting some piping and installing a propane fired on demand water heater as a backup to the solar system.

The solar array on the roof preheats cold water before being sent to the tankless propane fired water heater which will heat it up the rest of the way if needed. From here it goes to a series of three 100gallon storage tanks and then is distributed amongst the apartments in the building as needed.

The building houses 78 residents and with staff, about 90 people total. Between the solar hot water system and the propane tankless water heater, 100% of hot water demands are met.

The solar hot water collector array consists of 48 collectors in groups of 3-7 collectors each. Each group of collectors is connected in series, and the separate groups are then connected in parallel.

I was lucky enough to get a tour of the building and the setup by the maintenance guys, which was coordinated through one of my college professors.

Here are some pictures of the setup for your viewing pleasure.

Click on the thumbnails to make them larger.

First is a picture of the building itself from the gas station across the lake. You can see the collectors on the roof, and they are really not that unattractive or intrusive.

The collectors are mounted on the roof in what seems to be the best setup for space maximization

The mounts are rather straight forward, and the condensation you see here in the panels is normal.

The panels were mounted on trusses that went the span of the roof and attached on the ends

I believe these are 4'x8' panels but did not actually measure them

Collectors in each group are connected together like so:

There are vents in each collector to let moisture from condensation out as they heat up:

And each foot for the mounting has rubber underneath. This is to keep the two dissimilar metals (steel and aluminum) from causing corrosion.

Air vents on each group of collector were closed. The maintenance people said they were advised to do this for some reason or another, and it hadn't caused any problems yet.

The view was simply amazing.

As suggested by many, the pipes connecting collectors are insulated, and the insulation is covered in an aluminum sheathing to prevent UV degradation

Most groups of collectors had a thermometer installed in the outlet. This one was reading 90 degrees fahrenheit.

As you can see though this was a rather complicated setup. Much more so than most of us will ever have to endure when setting this up on a residence.

Here is a picture of the SRCC rating label on the collectors. Good stuff, I had no idea SRCC ratings were around in the late '80s. If you want more information on SRCC ratings, check out solar-rating.org

Some of the insulation was degrading. This is an insulated Tee fitting with some kind of plastic around the insulation

Some of the insulation in the panels was degrading too. There was also some corrosion. I still don't think this is bad for 21 years of service

Here is the only "shady" part of the install (no pun intended). This is an old barrel they put up here to collect any glycol in case of a pressure related blow out.

Here is the Resol differential controller and the Rinnai tankless propane water heater controller (the brains of the operation)

And a large storage tank

And here is the Rinnai tankless propane water heater

A close up of the Rinnai connections:

If you have any questions about the system, feel free to leave a comment here and I will get back to you. We will be doing some data logging to actually figure out how effective this system is.

I also have some diagrams of the system I will scan and upload in a few days.

The original post can be found here: DIY Solar Panel Mount

This is a mount that I removed from a Dish Network satellite dish.

The elevation and skew are marked on the mount in degrees, making it easy to mount your panel at the correct angle. Here is a link to some great info about the Optimum Orientation of Solar Panels

Here is the mount, with the markings for skew visible:

The solar panel will mount to the part of the satellite dish mount with the skew markings on it. I used two bolts, one on each side.

The elevation markings can be seen here. With the mount oriented as it is in the picture, the solar panel would be face down on the table.

Looking down at the mount, you will see this:

The circular part slips over a piece of pipe which can be mounted to your house or set in the ground. Unfortunately I do not have measurements on the mount with me, but will update with them later.

Here is the part where the solar panel mounts:

The whole thing will then rotate about the pipe collar by loosening the elevation bolt.

Another view here:

The side opposite the elevation markings:

This is how the mount would look when mounted on a vertical pipe.
Here you can see that the elevation of the mount is currently set to an angle of slightly less than 40 degrees. (this is after removing a satellite dish from the mount.. actual angle will depend on your location)

Hopefully this information is helpful to anyone looking to use one of these satellite dish mounts to hold solar panels.

FOR her 10th birthday, Nicole Kuepper received an inspirational present from her parents - her first solar-energy kit.

It sparked a fascination with solar technology that last night led to Ms Kuepper, 23, winning two Australian Museum Eureka Prizes for her scientific research.

She has developed a simple, cheap way of producing solar cells in a pizza oven that could eventually bring power and light to the 2 billion people in the world who lack electricity.

Ms Kuepper is a PhD student and lecturer in the school of photovoltaic and renewable energy engineering at the University of NSW.

"I love working with passionate people who want to help address climate change and poverty by thinking and experimenting outside the square," she said.

Today's photovoltaic cells that convert sunlight to electricity are expensive and need sophisticated, "clean" manufacturing plants.

Ms Kuepper realised a new approach would be needed if affordable cells were to be made on site in poorer countries: "What started off as a brainstorming session has resulted in the iJET cell concept that uses low-cost and low-temperature processes, such as ink-jet printing and pizza ovens, to manufacture solar cells."

While it could take five years to commercialise the patented technology, providing renewable energy to homes in some of the least developed countries would enable people to "read at night, keep informed about the world through radio and television and refrigerate life-saving vaccines". And it would also help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Ms Kuepper said that the solar cells should be of high enough quality to be used anywhere in the world, including Australia.

An advocate of green technology, she gives talks about solar energy to the public, has held miniature solar car races to teach indigenous children about renewable energy, and was a delegate at the 2020 Youth Summit in Canberra in April.

Ms Kuepper was awarded the British Council Eureka Prize for Young Leaders in Environmental Issues and Climate Change and a $10,000 study tour to Britain.

She also won the People's Choice Award, in which almost 16,000 members of the public voted for their favourite scientist out of six finalists. Twenty Eureka Prizes worth $200,000 were awarded last night at a ceremony at Royal Randwick Racecourse.

Other winners included Professor Robert Clark, of the University of NSW, for quantum computer research, Professor Stephen Simpson of the University of Sydney, for studies of locusts and human obesity, and Professor Matthew England and his University of NSW team for discoveries linking ocean temperature and rainfall.

I can't wait to see what they have figured out. This could be a major break through.

Necessity is the mother of invention, I suppose..

And with invention, comes innovation. Once this process has been released to the public, others will be able to expand on it to either make it more efficient, or to spur them to create other cheap efficient means of manufacturing solar cells.

Three cheers and six beers for Ms. Nicole Kuepper